The Future of Affirmative Action in College Admissions

In a recent episode, we delve into the Supreme Court's decision to end the use of race-based affirmative action in college admissions. With a conservative majority skeptical of using racial criteria, the decision was not entirely unexpected. However, it raises significant questions about the future of higher education in America and how colleges will achieve diversity without race-based admissions.

Supporters of affirmative action argue that it plays a crucial role in enabling diversity in higher education and addressing historical discrimination against marginalized groups. They believe that without considering race, colleges may struggle to create inclusive environments. On the other hand, critics argue that affirmative action violates the principle of equal protection under the law. They suggest alternative methods, such as considering economic status, to achieve diversity without using race as a factor.

The court's decision has sparked intense debate about the role of race in admissions and the broader issue of educational disparities in America. It highlights the ongoing tension between diversity and non-discrimination in American society. While some view the decision as a blow to affirmative action, others see it as an opportunity to explore new approaches to achieving diversity.

Join us as we explore the implications of the Supreme Court's decision and discuss the challenges of achieving diversity and addressing educational disparities in America. We'll hear from experts on both sides of the debate and explore potential alternatives to race-based admissions policies.

America’s Supreme Court has ended the use of race-based affirmative action in college admissions. It is 45 years since the court gave its blessing to such practices but, given that it now has a six-justice conservative majority sceptical of using racial criteria, the decision was no surprise. Why did the court do this, and was it right to?

The University of Chicago’s Geoffrey Stone explains why he thinks it was wrong. We go back to the first time the court ruled on affirmative action in admissions. And The Economist’s Steve Mazie analyses the justices’ opinions and dissents. 

John Prideaux hosts with Charlotte Howard and Idrees Kahloon.

You can now find every episode of Checks and Balance in one place and sign up to our weekly newsletter. For full access to print, digital and audio editions, as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at economist.com/uspod.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.